Outputs are risk leads for review, not findings of wrongdoing. Every item links to its source.
Follow the Public Dollar
About the tool
Most due-diligence tools start from a known bad actor and look for their assets. This tool reverses that: it starts from taxpayer money and looks for bad actors. That is the question inspectors general, auditors and journalists actually have: did public money end up somewhere it shouldn't have?
Risk leads, not accusations. Every output is a lead for human review, never a finding of wrongdoing. Each claim links to the primary record behind it, missing data is shown as missing, and no text is generated by a language model.
Each case starts from a network that a government agency has already acted on, to show the tool would have flagged it. Palantir is the clean control.
A composite score with every contributing signal shown, its evidence and its source. Proximity and trade mismatch weigh most because they are the hardest to explain innocently.
Inspectors general and auditors
“Did this award recipient pass money to risky parties?”
Investigative journalists
“Where is the story in this contract data?”
Prime contractors and grantmakers
“Are my subcontractors or grantees safe?”
Banks and compliance teams
“Is this government-funded client a front?”
Maria Ashby
Technical lead: schema, fixtures, scoring engine
India Clarke
Domain and evidence: primary-source research, citations, Lead Dossier copy, traceability
Lola C
Specs, control cases and risk typologies